1806 self-report questionnaires had been administered in 101 classrooms from additional and high schools in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, in November 2007. Approval to conduct the study had been acquired through the regional college inspectorate and through the principals of every college within the test. Moms and dads had been informed through the trained instructors therefore the pupils’ permission has also been required for taking part in the study. Both online and offline, a special part was dedicated to issues related to online-offline dating although the questionnaire aimed to encompass a variety of activities and behaviors.
The Internet for 3 hours on a school day (Std on average, boys in our sample use. Deviation =1.856) and 5.44 hours for a day weekend
(Std. Deviation=3.311), while girls make an online search for 2.77 hours for a college time and 4.61 for a week-end day. Additionally, the teenagers have already been making use of the online world for 2.88 years on average (Std. Deviation=2.123). Almost 50 % of them work with a cam if they talk on IM, men being less selective than girls (girls utilize the cam having a few buddies, men with virtually anyone inside their list — the real difference is significant, r=. 143, p Teenagers’ Actions and Interactions Online in Central and Eastern Europe. Potentials and Empowerment, dangers and victimization. Cluj: Cluj University Press.
Com?a, M., Sandu, D., Toth, A., Voicu, M., & Voicu, O. (2006). Public Advice Barometer. Perceptions about Mass-Media. Bucharest: Open Community Foundation.
Couch, D., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Internet dating and dating: making use of the online world to meet up with partners that are sexual. Qualitative Heath Research, 18, 268-280.
Daneback, K. (2006). Sexuality and love on the net. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Goteborg, Goteborg University.
Davis, C. M., & Bauserman, R. (1993). Contact with materials that are sexually explicit an mindset https://besthookupwebsites.net/hot-or-not-review/ change viewpoint. Yearly writeup on Intercourse analysis, 4, 121-209.
Davis, C. M., Hart, G., Bolding, G., Sherr, L., & Elford, J. (2006). E-Dating, identity and HIV prevention: Theorising sexualities, danger and community culture. Sociology of wellness & infection, 28, 457-478.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes within the on line environment that is dating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2). Retrieved Mai 2, 2009, from http: //jcmc. Indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison. Html
Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K.J., & Wolak, J. (2000). On line victimization: a written report from the nation’s youth. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Kids.
Fleming, M.J., Greentree, S., Cocotti-Muller, D., Elias, K.A., & Morrison, S. (2006). Security on the internet: Adolescents’ security and exposure on line. Youth & Community, 38, 135-154.
Gibbs, J.L., Ellison, N.B., & Heino, R.D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and identified success in internet dating. Correspondence Analysis, 33, 152-177.
Goodstein, A. (2007). Completely Wired: What Teens and Tweens Are Actually Doing On Line. Ny: Saint Martin’s Griffin.
Groof, S. De (2008). And my mama said…The (general) parental influence on concern about criminal activity among adolescent girls and boys. Youth & Community, 39, 267-293.
Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Web use and wellbeing in adolescence. Journal of Social problems, 58, 75-90.
Harter, S. (1985). Competence as a measurement of self-evaluation: Toward a model that is comprehensive of. In R.E. Leahy (Ed. ), the growth regarding the personal (pp. 55-121). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Heim, J., Brandtz?g, P.B., Kaare, B.H., Endestad, T., & Torgersen, L. (2007). Children’s use of news technologies and factors that are psychosocial. Brand Brand New Media & Community, 9, 425-454.
Hodkinson, P., & Lincoln, S. (2008). On line journals as digital rooms?: young adults, identification and space that is personal. Young, 16, 27-46.
Web World Stats (2009). Online use in European Union Table of internet surfers in eu, March 31, 2009. Retrieved might 26, 2009, from http: //www. Internetworldstats.com/stats9. Htm
Knox, D., Daniels, V., Sturdivant, L., & Zusman, M. (2001). University student utilization of the Web for mate selection. University Student Journal, 35, 158-160.
Korbin, J. E (2003). Young ones, childhoods, and physical violence. Yearly Reviews of Anthropology, 32, 431-446.
Kraut, R. E., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web paradox: A social technology that decreases social involvement and mental wellbeing? US Psychologist, 53, 1017-1032.
Ledbetter, A. M. (2008). Media usage and relational closeness in long-term friendships: Interpreting habits of multimodality. Brand Brand New Media & Community, 10, 547-565.
Lenhart, A. (2005). Protecting Teens On The Web. Washington, DC: The Pew Online & United States Lifestyle Venture.
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teenagers, Privacy and Online internet sites: exactly just How Teenagers manage their on line Identities and information that is personal within the chronilogical age of MySpace. Washington, DC: The Pew Web & American Lifestyle Venture.
Livingstone, S. (2002). Young adults and Brand New Media. London: Sage Publications.
Livingstone, S. (2003). Children’s utilization of the Web: Reflections for the appearing research agenda. Brand Brand Brand New Media & Community, 9, 147-166.
Livingstone, S. (2008). Using dangerous possibilities in youthful article marketing: teens’ usage of social network internet web sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. Brand Brand Brand New Media & Community, 10, 393-411.
Mesch, G.S. (2009). Personal bonds and Internet exposure that is pornographic adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 601-18.
Meyer, A. (2007). The ethical rhetoric of youth. Childhood 14(1), 85-104.
Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2001). Danger factors for and impact of online intimate solicitations of youth (brief report). Journal of this United states healthcare Association 285, 3011-3014. Doi: 10.1001/jama. 285.23.3011.
Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003a). Victimization of youth on the web. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 8 (1/2), 1-39.
Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003b). The visibility of youth to undesired material that is sexual the world wide web. A survey that is national of, effect, and avoidance. Youth & Community, 34, 330-358.
Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2004). Victimization of young ones on the web. In J.L. Mullings, J.W. Marquart & D.J. Hartley (Eds.). The Victimization of Kids: Emerging Issues (pp. 1-39). Nyc, NY: The Haworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press.
Moscardelli, D.M., & Divine, R. (2007). Adolescents’ issues for privacy while using the Internet: an analysis that is empirical of and relationships with privacy- protective actions. Family and customer Science Research Journal, 35(3), 232-253.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2006a). Adolescents exposure that is intimately explicit product on the web. Correspondence Analysis, 33, 178-204.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2006b). Analysis note: specific distinctions in perceptions of Web interaction. European Journal of Communication, 21, 213-226.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2007). Whom searches for casual dates on the net? A test of this settlement and also the relaxation hypotheses. Brand Brand Brand New Media & Community, 9, 455-474.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2008). Adolescents exposure that is intimately explicit Web product, intimate doubt, and attitudes toward uncommitted sexual exploration: Is there a hyperlink? Correspondence Analysis, 35, 579-601.
Rosen, L.D. (2006). Adolescents in MySpace: identification development, relationship and predators that are sexual. (Executive summary). Retrieved December 17, 2008, from http: //www. Csudh.edu/psych/.
Smith, A. (2007). Teenagers and Online Stranger Contact. (information memo). Washington, DC: The Pew Online & United States Lifetime Venture.
Toma, C.L., Hancock, J.T., & Ellison, N.B. (2008). Splitting reality from fiction: a study of misleading self-presentation in on line dating pages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.
Tynes, B.M. (2007). Online security gone crazy?: compromising the academic and mental advantages of online environments that are social. Journal of Adolescent analysis, 22, 575- 585.
Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the web. Effects for social competence and self-concept unity. Correspondence Analysis, 35, 208-231.
Walsh, W.A., & Wolak, J. (2005). Nonforcible Internet-related intercourse crimes with adolescent victims: Prosecution dilemmas and results. Child Maltreatment, 10(3), 260-271.
Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered away, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds. ), Handbook of Interpersonal Correspondence (3rd Ed.). (pp. 529-563). London: Sage Publications.
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2002). Close on line relationships in a sample that is national of. Adolescence, 37, 441-455.
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Undesirable and desired publicity to online pornography in a sample that is national of individuals. Pediatrics, 119, 247-257.